1、考研英语二全程规划及基础阅读示范课程考研英语二全程规划及基础阅读示范课程教育部特聘巡讲专家 林 健高分备考阶段要求、目标及真题材料的使用训练阶段时间分配复习重点使用材料目标春季基础训练暑期强化训练秋季整合提高考前冲刺点睛英语二考试项目高分规划题型分值平均分目标分完型10%阅读A40%阅读B新题型10%翻译15%小作文10%大作文15%第一部分 了解阅读一 . 解读大纲考研英语阅读理解一共由A B C 三个部分组成。A部分-考查方式 ：。阅读长度： 四篇（每篇约 字）考查能力： 能综合运用英语语言知识和阅读技能理解选自各类书籍和报刊的不同类型的英文书面文字材料。考查能力细化为8个方面：1. 理解
2、主旨要义；2. 理解文中的信息；3. 理解文中的概念性含义；4. 进行有关的判断、推理和引申；5. 根据上下文推测生词的词义；6. 理解文章的总体结构以及上下文之间的关系；7. 理解作者的意图、观点或态度；8. 区分论点和论据。考试题型分为五大类：1. 2 3. 4. 5. 二考研阅读理解的重要性和总体策略1. 比重大 -表现在 2. 难度大 -原因是 3.总体策略： 挖掘和发现考研阅读的命题规律-为什么题目会那么难？-哪一些内容和细节容易成为出题者关注的目标？-出题者究竟是如何在考题中提高难度的？ - 如何识破错误选项的设计三考研阅读理解文章的来源和特点文章内容包括了三大领域A. B C.
3、.1.对于说明文来说，最重要的是抓住文章的说明对象、事实和数据2.对于议论文来说，最重要的是总结作者的观点和结论、抓住作者的态度，以及作者的观点和态度与其他人的观点和态度之间的关系等等四考研阅读理解文章的语言难度考研阅读理解文章的语言难度主要体现在 和 上。1. 有 左右的派生词和合成词。2. 阅读理解真正的大敌在于 。五考研阅读理解的考点备战阅读方法和步骤如下：A. 初级阶段1.选择几套真题(注意：不要一口气做完所有的真题)，进行预热型练习。在做真题的时候要严格计时，每篇文章大约用16-20分钟，要从一开始就掌握好时间规律，养成做笔记的习惯。2. 不要做完一篇文章就对答案，而是做完一套真题的
4、四篇文章之后才一起对答案。不要急于去读相关题解，而是首先对照原文和正确答案思考自己对错的原因，重点考查自己为什么会做错，一般都错在哪种题型上，错误的原因是什么，做一个简单但是全面的分析。3. 精读文章，找出文章中至少5个长难句，练习对这些长难句进行结构上的分析，找出主干，理解主干和句子其他部分之间的逻辑联系，并试着在心里翻译这些长句的大概意思。之后对照本书给出的译文，看看自己的分析和翻译是否正确，找出存在的问题和差距。4. 阅读本书提供的题解和文章译文，总结出自己比较容易出错的题型，对照自己的解题思路和题解中的解题思路的差别，从而发现自己的思路中存在的一些普遍的问题，及时纠正。我们建议考生最好
5、能够准备一个专用的本子，把自己做错的题目都记录下来，做一个错题集。5. 重新阅读文章，找出所有不认识的单词，使用权威字典查看这些单词的意思和用法，并把它们都记在一个专用的单词本上，用平时的时间对这些单词加以记忆。许多考研文章中的生词出现的频率相当高，因此考生应该把这些单词都加到自己的词汇库里面，从而更加丰富自己的词汇量。6. 此外，考生还要对考研文章涉及的领域和知识有更多的了解，因为这些文章通常涉及一些比较热门的领域，今后考到相关领域的可能性也比较大。积累更多的背景知识将有助于理解文章和快速做题。B. 中级阶段1.各个题型的专项训练。考生应该在这个阶段利用这些练习重点训练自己比较不擅长题型的做
6、题能力，有的放矢地提高能力。2. 在完成了分题型训练之后，再回到整套的真题练习，把自己以前做过和没有做过的真题都混合在一起，每次依旧掐时间练习，如果有余力可以适当减少每篇文章的做题时间。对于以前没有做过的文章再按照第2-6步的方法进行精读，同时也要保持错题记录。此外，对于以前做过的真题，把这次的错题和上次的错题进行对照，看看自己是否有进步，另外还存在着什么问题C. 冲刺阶段在考研前一个月把所有的题型按照年代顺序再重新做一遍。有考生也许会质疑不断地做自己做过的题目是否有效果，但是实践证明做真题能够有效地帮助考生发现自己存在的问题。有些考生第一次做错了一个题目，对照了答案之后自己以为已经理解了错误
7、的原因，实则一知半解，因此第二次、甚至第三次做题的时候依旧犯同样的错误。不断地做真题能够让考生真正发现自己的问题所在，从而对自己所有的错误都做透彻的分析，对自己所有的弱点有充分的了解，因而可以针对自己的劣势进行重点复习。 第二部分 基础复习阶段真题材料使用示例Its a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slipping on your doormat. Light up the stove and you could burn down the house. Luckily, if the doorma
8、t or stove failed to warn of coming disaster, a successful lawsuit might compensate you for your troubles. Or so the thinking has gone since the early 1980s, when juries began holding more companies liable for their customers misfortunes.Feeling threatened, companies responded by writing ever-longer
9、 warning labels, trying to anticipate every possible accident. Today, stepladders carry labels several inches long that warn, among other things, that you might - surprise! - fall off. The label on a childs Batman cape cautions that the toy “does not enable user to fly.”While warnings are often appr
10、opriate and necessary - the dangers of drug interactions, for example - and many are required by state or federal regulations, it isnt clear that they actually protect the manufacturers and sellers from liability if a customer is injured. About 50 percent of the companies lose when injured customers
11、 take them to court.Now the tide appears to be turning. As personal injury claims continue as before, some courts are beginning to side with defendants, especially in cases where a warning label probably wouldnt have changed anything. In May, Julie Nimmons, president of Schutt Sports in Illinois, su
12、ccessfully fought a lawsuit involving a football player who was paralyzed in a game while wearing a Schutt helmet. “Were really sorry he has become paralyzed, but helmets arent designed to prevent those kinds of injuries,” says Nimmons. The jury agreed that the nature of the game, not the helmet, wa
13、s the reason for the athletes injury. At the same time, the American Law Institute - a group of judges, lawyers, and academics whose recommendations carry substantial weight - issued new guidelines for tort law stating that companies need not warn customers of obvious dangers or bombard them with a
14、lengthy list of possible ones. “Important information can get buried in a sea of trivialities,” says a law professor at Cornell law School who helped draft the new guidelines. If the moderate end of the legal community has its way, the information on products might actually be provided for the benef
15、it of customers and not as protection against legal liability.1. What were things like in 1980s when accidents happened?A Customers might be relieved of their disasters through lawsuitsB Injured customers could expect protection from the legal system.C Companies would avoid being sued by providing n
16、ew warningsD Juries tended to find fault with the compensations companies promised.2. Manufacturers as mentioned in the passage tend to _.A satisfy customers by writing long warnings on productsB become honest in describing the inadequacies of their productsC make the best use of labels to avoid leg
17、al liability.（C）D feel obliged to view customers safety as their first concern3. The case of Schutt helmet demonstrated that _.A some injury claims were no longer supported by law.B helmets were not designed to prevent injuriesC product labels would eventually be discarded（A）D some sports games migh
18、t lose popularity with athletes4. The authors attitude towards the issue seems to be _.A biasedB indifferentC puzzling（D）D objective.庖丁解牛示例【核心词汇】词汇与短语文中语义拓展1拓展2roughcompensate misfortunelabeljuryanticipate cautionregulation claimdefendantparalyzerecommendationsubstantialguidelinebombardlengthytrivia
19、litydraftcommunitylight upfail to dowarnofbe liable forside withamong other thingshave ones way【难句解析】1. While warnings are often appropriate and necessary the dangers of drug interactions, for example and many are required by state or federal regulations, it isnt clear that they actually protect the
20、 manufacturers and sellers from liability if a customer is injured. 2. As personal injury claims continue as before, some courts are beginning to side with defendants, especially in cases where a warning label probably wouldnt have changed anything. 3. In May, Julie Nimmons, president of Schutt Spor
21、ts in Illinois, successfully fought a lawsuit involving a football player who was paralyzed in a game while wearing a Schutt helmet. 4. At the same time, the American Law Institute a group of judges, lawyers, and academics whose recommendations carry substantial weight issued new guidelines for tort
22、 law stating that companies need not warn customers of obvious dangers or bombard them with a lengthy list of possible ones. 5. If the moderate end of the legal community has its way, the information on products might actually be provided for the benefit of customers and not as protection against legal liability. 【佳句仿写】1. 2. 3. 【文章结构阅读技能总结】
